{"product_id":"private-public-communication-online-hate-speech-counterspeech-moderation-grades-11-12","title":"Private and Public Communication Online | context collapse, hate speech vs. criticism, counterspeech, moderation | Language \u0026 Media Unit | Grades 11–12","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePrivate and Public Communication Online\u003c\/strong\u003e is a complete language and media unit for grades 11–12 on what happens when a message leaves the group chat and reaches a public audience: a 32-page student book and a 20-page teacher guide with expected answers, timed lesson plans and marking guidance. Students learn to tell criticism apart from personal attacks, mass outrage and group-based degradation, and they write their own counterspeech and moderation rules.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe first case is Sam, who writes “We really are professionals” after a poor rehearsal. A screenshot keeps only that sentence and Sam’s name, drops the shared joke before it, and lands on a public school account. From there students sort four comments on a school decision by target and action (“The reasons are unconvincing” is not the same as “You are incompetent”), compare a moderator’s bare “Be nice” with a reply that names an exclusion, and test two moderation rules for diversity of views and protection of participants. Each section ends with a debate question, for example whether fair moderation can be entirely automated, and two practice assessments close the unit. All cases are fictional, and nobody has to share personal experiences.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhat's Included\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e32-page student book (A4 PDF): four five-page sections, each with explanation, case material, workshop, judgment page and extension page\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFour original case materials (M1–M4): a screenshot taken out of context, four comments on a school decision, a weak moderator reply and two competing moderation rules\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConcept page defining context collapse, online outrage storm, hate speech and counterspeech, with a relationship task\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTwo practice assessments in the student book, each with an original source text, a task page (25\/40\/25\/10 marks) and a writing plan, plus a jigsaw, a portfolio page and a self-check\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e20-page teacher guide (A4 PDF): aims, sequence planning, differentiation, a minute-by-minute plan for each 90-minute lesson and expected reasoning for every A, B and C task\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeedback and exit-diagnosis pages for each section, and marking guidance for both practice assessments on a 100-point scheme\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEditable Word text edition (.docx) with its own pagination\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSources and an AI production note on the final teacher page\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFour 90-Minute Lessons + Assessment\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003e1 · From group chat to public audience\u003c\/strong\u003e — Student book pp. 3–7. Privacy as expectations about recipients, sharing and purpose. Students name three missing details in Sam’s screenshot and write a factual context correction that reveals no further private information. Debate: does an original joke remove all responsibility for the statement?\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003e2 · Distinguishing criticism from degradation\u003c\/strong\u003e — Pp. 8–12. Target, speech act and reference to individuals or groups. Students classify four comments, including one user who reposts the same criticism under unrelated posts, and rewrite the personal attack and the group exclusion as reasoned criticism of the decision.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003e3 · Counterspeech with audience awareness\u003c\/strong\u003e — Pp. 13–17. Counterspeech aimed at bystanders and those targeted, not only the aggressor. Students compare responses for clarity and support, write a reply of no more than 70 words, and debate when choosing not to reply can be responsible.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003e4 · Justifying moderation\u003c\/strong\u003e — Pp. 18–22. Rule A removes all negative comments; rule B allows criticism and moderates personal attacks, group-based degradation and publication of private information. Students add a transparent review procedure to rule B and ask whether fair moderation can be fully automated.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eConcepts, practice assessments and jigsaw\u003c\/strong\u003e — Pp. 23–32. Concept page, two timed practice assessments with writing plans, a jigsaw in home and expert groups, a portfolio page and a self-check.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ol\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eStudents Will Learn To\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain how a screenshot changes the communication setting by removing names, timing and earlier messages\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDistinguish criticism of a decision from personal attacks and group-based degradation, using target and speech act as criteria\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWrite counterspeech addressed to bystanders that names the problem and gives a reason\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvaluate moderation rules for diversity of views and participant protection and design a transparent review procedure\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWrite a structured analysis with a reasoned judgment and a serious objection in 90 or 135 minutes\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003ePerfect For\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrades 11–12 ELA and English Language courses with a unit on digital communication or media literacy\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTeachers who want to discuss hate speech through fictional cases instead of students’ own experiences\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClasses practicing source-based analysis and argument writing with a marked practice assessment\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDigital citizenship or civics electives that look at comment sections and moderation policies\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUK, Australian and IB classes: roughly maps to A Level English Language (Years 12–13), Years 11–12 senior secondary English and IB Diploma language courses\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWhy Teachers Choose This Unit\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEvery lesson is timed: opening (0–10 min), exploration (10–30), analysis (30–55), experiment (55–75) and consolidation (75–90), so you can see where a 45-minute break falls.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEach analysis task has two support levels. Support 1 starts with two marked details linked to a concept; Support 2 asks students to test an alternative explanation. The guide adds vocabulary cards, sectioned readings and oral rehearsal for students who need them.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMarking guidance splits 100 points into reconstruction 25, analysis and comparison 40, judgment 25 and communication 10, with sub-criteria such as 'serious objection and response 5'. No particular opinion is required for full marks.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeedback lines you can use straight away: instead of “be more precise”, students identify a specific detail in M1 and explain its link to the concept; instead of “improve wording”, they split description and evaluation into two sentences.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAll cases and assessment texts were written for this unit, so students meet them fresh and you can mark responses against the expected reasoning in the guide.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSave with the bundle:\u003c\/strong\u003e this unit is part of the \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/teachlessons.us\/products\/language-digital-media-bundle-emojis-memes-multimodal-analysis-online-communication-grades-11-12\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLanguage \u0026amp; Digital Media Bundle\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e — all four language \u0026amp; media units for $49.90 instead of $99.96. All 24 upper-secondary units are in \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/teachlessons.us\/products\/upper-secondary-complete-24-units-music-media-philosophy-psychology-grades-11-12\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUpper Secondary Complete\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e for $149.90.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTeaching the whole course? See also \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/teachlessons.us\/products\/language-and-communication-in-analog-and-digital-media-grades-10-12\"\u003eLanguage and Communication in Analog and Digital Media\u003c\/a\u003e ($24.99).\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCreated with AI assistance: ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Claude (Anthropic). Illustrations were generated with OpenAI image generation as discussion prompts; they are not photographs. Edited for classroom use before publication. Sources and the full AI note are on the final teacher guide page.\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFrequently Asked Questions\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWhich courses and exams does this unit fit?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt is written for grades 11–12 English Language Arts, language and media electives and media literacy courses that work on online communication, hate speech and moderation. It roughly maps to A Level English Language (Years 12–13) in the UK, Years 11–12 senior secondary English in Australia and IB Diploma language courses. There is no official endorsement by College Board\/AP, IB, any UK exam board, ACARA or a state. The unit was originally developed for German upper-secondary courses; the English edition is a full parallel version.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHow long does it take?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe teacher guide plans four 90-minute core lessons covering student book pages 3–22, one per section. Workshop and extension tasks can need extra time. The jigsaw takes 45–60 minutes, and each practice assessment takes 90 minutes, or 135 for extended advanced-course work. The guide says plainly that four double lessons do not cover every activity in the pack, so you choose which extensions and assessments to add.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDo students have to talk about their own experiences of online abuse?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo. All cases are fictional, and the unit states that nobody is required to disclose distressing personal experiences. The teacher guide asks you to allow voluntary contributions and analytical distance. The categories (criticism, personal attack, group-based degradation, outrage dynamics) are tools for analysis, not a binding legal classification, and the counterspeech section says explicitly that nobody is obliged to enter a distressing confrontation.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHow is it delivered?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInstant digital download after checkout: the 32-page student book and the 20-page teacher guide as A4 PDFs, plus an editable Word text edition. The PDFs print on US Letter if you select fit-to-page in the print dialog. For graded use, the guide recommends handing out only the source material and tasks and keeping the teacher guide separate. Published primary texts, translations and third-party recordings are not included.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cscript type=\"application\/ld+json\"\u003e{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Which courses and exams does this unit fit?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"It is written for grades 11–12 English Language Arts, language and media electives and media literacy courses that work on online communication, hate speech and moderation. It roughly maps to A Level English Language (Years 12–13) in the UK, Years 11–12 senior secondary English in Australia and IB Diploma language courses. There is no official endorsement by College Board\/AP, IB, any UK exam board, ACARA or a state. The unit was originally developed for German upper-secondary courses; the English edition is a full parallel version.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"How long does it take?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"The teacher guide plans four 90-minute core lessons covering student book pages 3–22, one per section. Workshop and extension tasks can need extra time. The jigsaw takes 45–60 minutes, and each practice assessment takes 90 minutes, or 135 for extended advanced-course work. The guide says plainly that four double lessons do not cover every activity in the pack, so you choose which extensions and assessments to add.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Do students have to talk about their own experiences of online abuse?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"No. All cases are fictional, and the unit states that nobody is required to disclose distressing personal experiences. The teacher guide asks you to allow voluntary contributions and analytical distance. The categories (criticism, personal attack, group-based degradation, outrage dynamics) are tools for analysis, not a binding legal classification, and the counterspeech section says explicitly that nobody is obliged to enter a distressing confrontation.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"How is it delivered?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Instant digital download after checkout: the 32-page student book and the 20-page teacher guide as A4 PDFs, plus an editable Word text edition. The PDFs print on US Letter if you select fit-to-page in the print dialog. For graded use, the guide recommends handing out only the source material and tasks and keeping the teacher guide separate. Published primary texts, translations and third-party recordings are not included.\"}}]}\u003c\/script\u003e","brand":"Teach Lessons","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":58787418636632,"sku":null,"price":24.99,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"url":"https:\/\/teachlessons.us\/products\/private-public-communication-online-hate-speech-counterspeech-moderation-grades-11-12","provider":"Teach Lessons","version":"1.0","type":"link"}