Teaching Christo and Jeanne-Claude: Concept Art at Scale

Art history ยท Grades 9โ€“12

Teaching Christo and Jeanne-Claude: Concept Art at Scale

Wrapped buildings, fabric fences and floating walkways taught as projects rather than photographs: drawings, permits, engineering, funding and a couple of weeks of public spectacle at the end. For grades 9 to 12, with drawing analysis and a proposal brief.

See the unit โ†’
Cross-curricular, 9-12art, design or civics
Process over objectdrawings, permits, funding, temporary works
Proposal brief suppliedstudents plan a temporary intervention

Resources that fit

Units and bundles for this topic

Start with the unit that matches your next teaching block; the bundle is there if you need the whole strand. Tap any cover for the full contents, preview and price.

The teaching problem

Temporary work leaves a teaching problem

Everything Christo and Jeanne-Claude made came down again. The Reichstag stood wrapped for two weeks in 1995 and then the fabric went to recycling. Students meet these projects as photographs, which flattens years of negotiation into one striking picture and invites the response that it must have been expensive and pointless. The years are the work: twenty-four of them for the Reichstag, twenty-six for The Gates, spent on drawings, models, engineering reports, landowner agreements and a parliamentary vote, paid for entirely by selling the preparatory drawings rather than by sponsors or public money. That funding decision is the detail students find genuinely surprising, and it turns a photograph into a case study about who gets to change a public place.

A sequence that works

From drawing to permit to fabric

The unit follows one project from first sketch through to removal, then asks students to plan their own temporary work for a real site they know, with the same categories of problem to solve.

  1. What wrapping does to an objectSmall wrapped objects made in class from cloth and twine. Students record what is hidden, what the new silhouette reveals, and what the folds themselves tell a viewer.
  2. Reading a preparatory drawingCollage drawings carrying fabric samples, maps and technical notes. Students identify which parts are persuasion aimed at officials and which are working information for engineers.
  3. Permission is part of the workThe Reichstag vote and The Gates negotiations laid out as a timeline. Students list every party who had to agree and what each of them wanted in return.
  4. Paying for it without sponsorsThe funding model built on selling drawings. Students work out what independence from sponsors buys, what it costs, and why donations were consistently refused.
  5. Proposing a temporary workStudents choose a local site and produce a drawing, a materials note and a one page permission case addressed to whoever actually owns that piece of ground.

Where it goes wrong

Assessing proposals, not pretty drawings

The typical weak proposal is a spectacular idea with no site, no owner and no removal plan, and it wins a class vote every time. The criteria sheet therefore weights the permission case and the takedown as heavily as the image. Two content errors are worth correcting as they appear: students credit Christo alone, when the works have been jointly credited to Christo and Jeanne-Claude since 1994 and she handled much of the negotiation and finance; and they assume sponsorship or public money paid for the projects, when the money came from selling preparatory works. Both are checkable, and both change the argument students end up making.

What's in the download

Inside the files

Editable Word and PowerPoint plus print-ready PDFs, with answer keys throughout.

  • Preparatory drawing analysis sheets
  • Project timelines for two major works
  • Proposal brief with permission case template
  • Wrapping exercise and material list
  • Funding model explainer with discussion prompts

Good to know

Frequently asked questions

Do students need drawing skills for the proposal?

Not refined ones. The brief asks for a drawing that communicates a plan, and the criteria reward clarity, scale and annotation ahead of rendering. Students who prefer it can work over a photograph of their site with collaged material on top, which is close to how the original drawings were assembled. Weaker drawers often do their best work on the permission case and the materials note.

How long does the whole unit take?

Four lessons of analysis and discussion, plus a proposal that fits into one lesson or stretches across two to three weeks depending on how far you push the drawing and the case document. Schools running it as a cross-curricular block with civics or design usually take the longer route. The four analysis lessons stand alone if you have only a fortnight to give it.

Is this art, or is it design and civics?

It is an art unit that borrows from both, which is why it suits teachers asked to show cross-curricular links. The analysis lessons are art history: reading a drawing, judging a temporary work, arguing about what counts as the piece. The proposal pulls in consultation, ownership and budgeting. Design or civics teachers often run lessons three to five with the making removed.

Projects that took decades, taught in weeks

Drawings, votes, money and fabric, with a proposal brief that makes students argue their case for a real site.

Browse the full collection โ†’