Teaching Migration and Multicultural Society in English
Teaching Migration and Multicultural Society in English
Migration turns up in almost every upper-secondary English syllabus, usually as a bundle of statistics and one short story. This page sets out how to teach it as a language-and-perspective topic: whose voice tells the story, which words carry judgment, and how students write about it without slipping into cliche.
See the unit →Resources that fit
Units and bundles for this topic
Start with the unit that matches your next teaching block; the bundle is there if you need the whole strand. Tap any cover for the full contents, preview and price.
The teaching problem
Where migration lessons usually go wrong
The difficulty is not that students have nothing to say. It is that they have too much, and most of it arrives from headlines rather than from the text in front of them. The words are contested before the lesson starts: migrant, refugee, asylum seeker and expat describe overlapping realities, and choosing one is already an argument. Students who sense that will pick the safest sentence they can and write almost nothing. Others generalize from a single narrator to millions of people. Material dates quickly too, so a source pack from four years ago reads as history. Lesson design has to separate two jobs that classes usually blur: working out what a specific text claims and how it makes the claim, and forming a defensible view of your own.
A sequence that works
A five-lesson route through migration
The sequence moves from one narrow text to a wider debate, then back to writing. It assumes two lessons a week and no prior work on the topic, and it ends with a piece of assessed writing.
- Naming the people involvedStudents match migrant, refugee, asylum seeker and expat to short definitions, then read three headlines and decide what work the chosen word is doing in each one.
- One narrator, one short textA first-person account read closely for voice and detail. Students mark what the narrator notices, what she avoids, and where the reader is invited to fill a gap.
- What the numbers leave outA short data set with its date and source attached. Students write two accurate sentences from it, then a third that is technically true and clearly misleading.
- Two writers disagree in printPaired opinion extracts on the same policy. Students chart claim, evidence and concession for each, then mark the single place where the two writers actually agree.
- Writing the assessed commentForty-five minutes on a statement drawn from the unit. Students plan with the chart from lesson four, then draft, using the vocabulary sheet to keep their terms precise.
Where it goes wrong
Errors that cost marks here
Three errors show up in almost every set. Students treat one narrator as a spokesperson for millions, which turns a careful reading into a claim about a whole population. Next comes the collective subject, as in "the migrants think" or "they want", where the text supports neither reading. Third, a statistic arrives with no date, no country and no definition of who was actually counted. Head all three off by requiring a source line beside every number and a name beside every claim about people. When you mark, score the reasoning and the language separately from the position taken. A student can reach a conclusion you disagree with and still write the best answer in the room.
What's in the download
Inside the files
Editable Word and PowerPoint plus print-ready PDFs, with answer keys throughout.
- Source pack with dates and origins
- Vocabulary sheet for contested terms
- Editable Word worksheets, four levels
- Model comment with marking notes
- Slides for the paired-source lesson
- Answer keys for every task
Good to know
Frequently asked questions
Do students need background in politics or history?
No. The unit assumes they can read a short text closely and write a paragraph with evidence in it. Everything else is supplied: definitions, dated sources, and the context notes that go with each extract. If your group has already covered globalization or postcolonial writing, you can move faster through the first two lessons and spend the time you save on the paired-source work instead.
The topic moves quickly. Will the sources still work next year?
Some will and some will not, which is why the files are editable Word rather than locked PDFs. Every source carries its date and origin on the page, so a class can see when something is three years old and discuss what may have changed since. When you replace an extract, the task wording usually stays as it is; only the source line and the numbers need updating.
Where does this fit alongside Common Core, GCSE or A Level?
It sits with the non-fiction reading and argument-writing strands rather than the literature ones. The close reading and evidence tasks line up with informational text work in Common Core, and the comment matches the argument writing expected at GCSE and A Level. The material is built to fit alongside those courses, not approved by any board, so check your own specification before you plan the assessment.
Start with the text, then the argument
Run the sequence in order the first time. Once you know how your group argues, the data lesson is the one to cut or extend.
Browse the full collection →