A first lesson on analysing political speeches can go one of two ways: a lively look at how words move people, or a dry list of devices students forget by Friday. This ready-to-run opening lesson aims for the former, giving you the essential content, a clear sequence and a genuine check for understanding. It sits well within the Curriculum for Wales, where the Languages, Literacy and Communication Area of Learning and Experience asks learners across the progression steps to age 16 to understand how language is crafted to influence — and it builds directly towards GCSE (WJEC/Eduqas).
What to cover first
Resist the urge to introduce a dozen rhetorical terms at once. For lesson one, three ideas are plenty: a speech has a purpose, an audience, and methods chosen to bridge the two. Pick one short, vivid extract — a call to action works well — and let students feel its effect before naming a single device. The curated extracts and annotation tasks in Analysing Political Speeches – Rhetoric and Stylistic Devices spare you the search for suitable material and keep the lesson anchored in real rhetoric rather than invented examples.
A clear teaching sequence
Run the hour in four crisp phases so no one drifts:
- React (5 minutes): Play or read the extract. Ask only, “How does this make you feel, and where exactly?”
- Name (15 minutes): Introduce three devices you can see in the text — the rule of three, direct address, and emotive language — and label them together.
- Analyse (20 minutes): Students pick one device and write a sentence explaining its effect on the audience and how it serves the speaker's purpose.
- Share (10 minutes): A few responses read aloud, refined live for precision.
Insist on the “so what” move throughout: naming a device earns little at GCSE unless students explain its effect. Because dramatic language relies on the same persuasive instinct, the close-reading habits in Shakespeare – Analysing a Drama (Macbeth) make a natural follow-up once students are confident spotting technique.
Building precise analytical language
Give learners the vocabulary to sound like analysts, not spotters. A compact device bank — anaphora, antithesis, emotive language, rhetorical question, the rule of three — each paired with one line of example and a “typical effect” note, becomes a reference they will reuse all unit. Encourage tentative phrasing such as “this implies” or “this positions the audience to feel”, which reads far more maturely than blunt assertion. If your class enjoys how rhetoric can build a whole persuasive world, the dystopian propaganda material in Dystopia – Orwell's 1984 and Beyond offers a compelling comparison text for a later session.
A quick check for understanding
Close with a short exit task that reveals what stuck:
- Name one device the speaker uses.
- Quote the exact words where it appears.
- Explain, in one sentence, its effect on the audience.
- State the speaker's purpose in using it.
Read the exit slips as a quick diagnostic. If most students name a device but skip the effect, plan tomorrow's starter around the “so what” move. If quotations are vague, model precise selection again. If the purpose is missing, remind them that method always serves aim. This responsive loop is exactly the progression the Curriculum for Wales expects, and it sets your learners in Wales on a confident path towards the analytical writing GCSE (WJEC/Eduqas) rewards.
Comments
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a comment
Comments are reviewed before being published.
Thanks for your comment!
Your comment is being reviewed and will appear here shortly.