Mead's I and Me and the Generalized Other, Explained for Students
Mead's I and Me and the Generalized Other, Explained for Students
Mead's terms look simple on a slide and fall apart in student essays. The I turns into "the free part," the Me into "the part society controls," and the generalized other into "what everyone thinks." G. H. Mead: I, Me and Self gives you a 32-page student workbook and a 20-page teacher guide for four 90-minute lessons. Students work through three fictional cases: a theater rehearsal signal, Nora's unplanned presentation ending and a children's market. The guide has annotated case solutions, three-step support for each unit and a 100-point rubric.
See the Mead unit →Resources that fit
Units and bundles for this topic
G. H. Mead: I, Me and Self is the unit for this topic. The Moral Development & Socialization Bundle adds Kohlberg, the critiques of Kohlberg and Fend for less than buying four units singly, and Upper Secondary Complete covers all 24 units for whole-course planning.
G. H. Mead: I, Me and Self | Role-Taking, Play and Game, Generalized Other, Socialization | Psychology & Educational Studies Unit | Grades 11–12
Moral Development & Socialization Bundle | 4 Complete Units: Kohlberg, Critiquing Kohlberg, G. H. Mead, Fend's Functions of Schooling | Grades 11–12
Kohlberg: Moral Reasoning and Dilemma Discussion | Six Stages, Cognitive Conflict, Dilemmas | Psychology & Educational Studies Unit | Grades 11–12
Critiquing Kohlberg | Gilligan, Justice and Care, Cross-Cultural Research, Just Community | Psychology & Educational Studies Unit | Grades 11–12
Fend: Functions of Schooling | Qualification, Selection, Allocation, Integration, Enculturation | Psychology & Educational Studies Unit | Grades 11–12
Upper Secondary Complete | 24 Units: Music in Society, Language & Digital Media, Philosophy, Psychology & Educational Studies | Grades 11–12
The teaching problem
What Mead actually meant: the concepts in plain terms
Mead's account of the self comes from Mind, Self, and Society, published in 1934 and edited by Charles W. Morris from lecture material after Mead's death. His starting point is that the self is not an inner core we are born with and then display. It develops through social interaction. A person becomes an object to themselves by taking other people's perspectives on their own conduct. Shared symbols, above all language, make this possible because they let people anticipate how others will respond. Role-taking is the name for bringing those expectations into your own action. The unit stresses one point students often miss: role-taking is not obedience. Knowing what others expect is also what makes reasoned disagreement possible.
The Me is the set of organized attitudes of others that a person takes toward themselves. It lets you see your own action from a social point of view. The I is the response to those attitudes, the part of action that cannot be fully anticipated, and it only becomes visible afterwards, when it can be reflected on. Mead's play and game distinction explains how this develops. In play, a child takes one particular role at a time, shopkeeper now and customer later. In a game, the child has to hold several roles in mind at once and know how they fit together. That organized set of expectations is the generalized other.
A worked example from the unit shows how these fit together. Nora is expected to read the final slide of a group presentation, and she knows the group wants a predictable ending. Instead she asks the audience an open question, and afterwards says she surprised herself. The expected slide reflects the Me, the group's organized expectations. Her question can be read as an I moment, a response nobody fully planned. In the review, the group discusses whether the new ending was clearer and plans an audience question for next time. Her response has now become part of shared expectations. Note that the I moment was not rebellious. It was a small, unplanned contribution.
A sequence that works
How to teach Mead in four lessons
This sequence follows the unit's lessons, each built around one fictional case.
- Shared meaningStart with the theater rehearsal. The director raises a hand and everyone stops except a new member who keeps performing. Ask whether he is disobedient. The teacher guide's answer: the gesture works only because its meaning is shared, and he has not learned it yet.
- Role-taking as more than conformityContinue the case. Another performer explains the signal and asks about conventions in the newcomer's old group. Later he proposes a new signal for requesting a break, and the group adopts it. Students see role-taking that leads to change rather than simple adaptation.
- I and MeUse Nora's presentation to separate the Me, the group's organized expectations, from the I, her unplanned question. Have students explain why "I = free, Me = unfree" is misleading, and why the I is not the same as Freud's id or simple selfish impulse.
- Play, game and the generalized otherChildren first take turns as shopkeeper and customer, then run a market with sales, deliveries, payment and a rotation schedule. One child handles payment and goods at once and the process breaks down. Students compare an observer's "no discipline" with the educator's question about how roles are coordinated.
- Judgment and writingThe fourth lesson is a writing workshop on the market case: concept mapping, choosing criteria such as participation or feasibility, planning, and drafting one analysis paragraph and one judgment. The full 90-minute practice assessment, scored out of 100, needs an extra session.
Where it goes wrong
Misconceptions to plan for
These four errors appear in almost every first attempt at Mead, and the unit addresses each one directly.
"The I is free and the Me is unfree." Social expectations in the Me also make cooperation and agency possible, because people act within situations they both understand. An I response need not be spectacular or break any rules. Nora's open question at the end of a presentation is a quiet example, and it went on to shape the group's next plan.
"I and Me are Mead's version of Freud's id, ego and superego." They are not separate parts or people inside the mind and do not map onto Freud's model. They are two moments of one social and reflexive process. The teacher guide warns that diagrams should keep this dynamic relationship and not turn it into a mechanical formula.
"Role-taking means doing what others expect." Role-taking brings other people's perspectives into your own action. It is not obedience or full agreement. Understanding the expected response is what makes reasoned disagreement possible, as the newcomer in the rehearsal case shows when he proposes a new signal that the group then adopts.
"The generalized other is what everyone in society thinks." It is an organized community perspective, such as a team, a learning group or an institution, not an average person or world opinion. People belong to several communities whose expectations can conflict, so a strong answer names the relevant community instead of using "society" as a vague label.
Course fit
Where Mead fits in sociology, psychology and education courses
Mead belongs in any unit on socialization or symbolic interactionism, and his ideas also connect to developmental psychology and child development electives that look at how children learn roles and rules through play. The unit uses original teaching summaries rather than long primary-text extracts, with pointers to Mind, Self, and Society and the relevant sections on play, game and the generalized other and on the I and the Me. Students who want to read Mead in the original can follow those references, but no outside reading is needed to complete any task.
Mead also pairs well with the other units in the strand. Kohlberg's stages describe how moral reasoning changes, and Mead offers a social account of how a person comes to take others' perspectives at all. Fend's functions of schooling raise the question of what integration and enculturation mean, which links back to the generalized other. The assessment task asks students to connect the Mead case to another unit, so teaching two of these together pays off at the writing stage. Either order works, since the task only asks for a reasoned connection to one other unit.
Marking
Assessing Mead answers fairly
The practice assessment is scored out of 100: Task 1 asks students to explain the concepts of the third unit (20 points), Task 2 to analyze the market case and connect it to another unit (35), Task 3 to evaluate an option with two criteria, an alternative and a limitation (25), and communication is worth 20. The guide is clear that technical terms without application do not earn full analysis credit. Different judgments can earn equal marks when they are accurate, backed by evidence and justified through explicit criteria.
The assessment uses the familiar market case on purpose, so it is writing practice, not an unseen exam. For a graded test you would need a new case. The guide also gives a three-level competency review: with support, mostly independent, secure with reasons. It suggests targeted follow-up for each weakness, such as sorting examples and non-examples when concepts are shaky or practicing a single evidence-concept sentence when analysis is thin. Ratings concern the task in front of the student, not fixed personal traits.
Questions teachers ask
Frequently asked questions
Which courses does the Mead unit fit?
It fits grades 11–12 sociology, psychology and education electives that cover socialization and the self. It roughly maps to A Level Sociology (Years 12–13), Australian senior secondary Sociology or Psychology (Years 11–12) and IB Diploma social science courses, and it can serve as enrichment alongside AP Psychology or AP-level social science work. TeachLessons is not affiliated with or endorsed by the College Board, IB, any exam board, ACARA or any state. The unit was originally developed for German upper-secondary courses; the English edition is a full parallel version.
What is the difference between play and game in Mead?
In play, a child takes one particular role at a time, for example acting as shopkeeper and then as customer. In a game, the child must coordinate several organized roles at once and understand how they relate. The organized perspective of the whole group is the generalized other. The unit's market case shows the shift from simple role switching to a market with sales, deliveries, payment and a rotation schedule.
Is the I just a person's spontaneous or selfish side?
No. The I is the response to the organized attitudes of others, and it carries an element that cannot be fully predicted. It is not simply selfish impulse, and it does not have to be dramatic or rule-breaking. The unit's teaching text and teacher guide both make this point, and Nora's case gives students a quiet, ordinary example of an I moment.
What is in the unit?
A 32-page student workbook (A4 PDF) with three teaching texts, three fictional cases, annotated reasoning examples, transfer labs, discussion cards and a 90-minute assessment practice. A 20-page teacher guide with a four-lesson plan with minute timings, differentiation, annotated case solutions, graduated support, a 100-point rubric and references. An editable Word text edition is included. Delivery is an instant download; the PDFs print on US Letter with fit-to-page.
Do students have to share personal experiences?
No. The cases are fictional so that students can analyze from a distance. The teacher guide says nobody should diagnose themselves or disclose personal experiences, and that assessment concerns concepts and reasoning, not moral qualities or identity. Discussion uses rotating roles such as concept checker, evidence checker and alternative perspective, with written or observational participation as options.
How does the unit support weaker readers?
Each unit has three-step graduated support: first separating events, statements and missing information, then concept anchors with short definitions, then a sentence frame for cautious conclusions. Students who do not need the frame develop an alternative interpretation instead. The guide also suggests section-by-section reading, oral rehearsal and a personal glossary for students who are still building their English.
Teach Mead so students can apply the concepts as well as define them
G. H. Mead: I, Me and Self gives you the cases, annotated answers and rubric for four lessons.
Browse the full collection →