Ask a 5th Year class what a character is like and you get adjectives. Ask how the writer made them think that and the room goes quiet. Characterisation at Leaving Certificate level is not description; it is an account of technique, and the gap between the two is where most single-text answers lose their grip. This is a five-lesson sequence with the objective, the core activity and the check for each, plus the honest version for when you only have three lessons.
Lessons one and two: evidence before opinion
Lesson one has a narrow objective: students can locate the exact words that produced an impression. Give a two-page extract and a single instruction, that every judgement must be followed by the quotation that caused it. No general statements allowed, not even true ones. The check is a paired reading where each student reads their partner's judgement and must find the quotation independently. If they cannot, the judgement was assumption rather than reading.
Lesson two adds the vocabulary of method: direct statement, action, speech, other characters' reactions, setting used as a mirror, and the narrator's own colouring. Students reclassify the quotations they gathered in lesson one under those headings. The check is a tally on the board. It usually shows the class relies almost entirely on direct statement, which tells them why their essays sound thin and tells you what to teach next.
Lesson three: the pivot from what to how
This is the lesson the sequence exists for. Objective: students can explain the effect of a technique rather than name it. Take one paragraph of dialogue and rewrite it three ways on the board, changing only the speech, and ask what changes in the reader's sense of the person. Nothing else moves, so the effect is attributable. The check is a single written sentence in the form: the writer's use of ______ makes the reader ______, because ______. Collect them and read four aloud without names.
A structured resource keeps this lesson from drifting into general discussion, and Characterisation and Analysing Fiction is built for precisely this move, with extracts and question sets at four levels so an Ordinary Level group and a Higher Level group can work on the same technique at genuinely different depths.
Lessons four and five: from paragraph to answer
Lesson four is about shape. Objective: students can build a paragraph that opens with a claim about method, supports it with brief embedded quotation and closes on effect. Model one badly first, with the quotation dropped in whole and unexamined, and let the class diagnose it against the published marking scheme criteria for their level. The check is one paragraph written in twelve minutes, peer-marked against three criteria only.
Lesson five puts it under time: a full question in exam conditions, forty minutes, no notes. The check is your own reading afterwards, sorted into two piles rather than graded, and the feedback is whole-class rather than individual. Speech and register reward closer attention than most classes give them, and Conceptuality and Mediality – Koch & Oesterreicher's Language Proximity & Distance Teaching Unit gives students a proper framework for why a character's speech reads as intimate or distant, which lifts the dialogue analysis in lesson three well beyond "informal language".
What to cut when the sequence loses two lessons
It will. Retreats, mocks, a week of storms. Cut lesson two and merge lessons four and five. What must not be cut is lesson three, because everything else is either gathering or formatting, and a class that skips the pivot writes tidy essays with nothing in them. If you only have three periods: gather evidence, teach effect, write under time. The technique vocabulary can be taught in fragments during other texts.
Checking it actually landed
Two weeks later, hand out a fresh extract from a text the class has never seen and ask for one paragraph. That is the only test that matters, because a student who can only do this on the studied novel has learned the novel, not the skill. Students who have met characterisation across different formats transfer more readily, and Classical & Multimodal Literary Formats – Opportunities and Challenges is useful for that widening, since a character built through images or sound makes the constructedness impossible to ignore. When the sequence has worked, the adjectives are still there in students' answers, but they arrive at the end of a sentence rather than the start, with the evidence in front of them.


Comments
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a comment
Comments are reviewed before being published.
Thanks for your comment!
Your comment is being reviewed and will appear here shortly.